Major League Soccer (MLS) has stirred controversy with a decision to permanently ban Pride flags during the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup, citing a desire to “maintain a neutral and unified environment.” The move has been met with fierce criticism from LGBTQ+ groups, players, and fans who argue that it silences marginalized communities and undermines the league’s previously inclusive image.
Watch live soccer online
MLS Commissioner Don Garber defended the ban, saying, “Soccer should be about the game, not political or social statements.” He added that removing symbols like the Pride flag would help create a “neutral playing field” for the global tournament, allowing fans to focus solely on the sport.
Watch live sports online
However, many critics view the move as exclusionary rather than neutral. LGBTQ+ advocacy group Rainbow Pitch called it a “way to avoid saying what it really is: exclusion.” Fans on social media expressed disappointment, with hashtags like #PrideInSoccer trending in protest.
Some players also voiced concerns. One anonymous MLS player commented, “When fans are told they can’t bring Pride flags, it feels like the league is saying their whole selves aren’t welcome.”
Supporters of the ban, however, argue that sports should remain free from political messages and that this decision helps maintain peace in a diverse, international event. Some even viewed it as a necessary move to prevent alienating fans from countries with different cultural views on LGBTQ+ issues.
Watch live sports online
The controversy has drawn comparisons to FIFA’s actions during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, where similar restrictions were placed on LGBTQ+ symbols. Many fear this trend is continuing, even in countries where LGBTQ+ rights are widely accepted.
The backlash also highlights MLS’s past support for LGBTQ+ causes, with Pride Nights and partnerships with advocacy groups. Fans criticized the hypocrisy of celebrating Pride one day and banning it the next.
Financial pressures may have played a role, as the league might be seeking to avoid alienating international sponsors. However, critics warn that the decision could backfire, potentially hurting MLS’s fanbase and reputation.
As the tournament approaches, LGBTQ+ advocates are planning protests, both online and outside stadiums. The controversy has reignited a larger debate about sports’ role in social change, with many arguing that the platform should be used to promote inclusivity, not neutrality.
For now, MLS stands by its decision, claiming it is about unity. However, with growing protests, the decision’s long-term impact remains uncertain. As one fan summed up: “Soccer is called ‘the beautiful game’ for a reason. It’s a shame when decisions like this make it anything but.”